Henry Ward Beecher (1. Henry Ward Beecher was a fighter . I never met his equal in readiness and versatility. His vitality was infectious. Jango is about making online music social, fun and simple. Free personal radio that learns from your taste and connects you to others who like what you like. The text of 'O Come, O Come, Emmanuel,' in all its various versions, is a metrical paraphrase of the O Antiphons, so the intricate theological allusions of the hymn. Torrent anonymously with torrshield encrypted vpn pay with bitcoin. The International Songwriting Competition is now accepting applications. Open to all songwriters! He was a big, healthy, vigorous man with the physique of an athlete, and his intellectual fire and vigor corresponded with his physical strength. There seemed to be no limit to his ideas, anecdotes, illustrations, and incidents. He had a fervid imagination and wonderful power of assimilation and reproduction and most observant of eyes. He was drawing material constantly from the forests, the flowers, the gardens, and the domestic animals in the fields and in the house, and using them most effectively in his sermons and speeches,” recalled Republican politician Chauncey M. Depew. 1. As a speaker, wrote biographer Joseph R. Beecher was “always ready, hearty, sincere, with a purpose intelligently put, intelligently carried out.”2 Howard wrote: “He preached without notes and talked as if inspired. His prayers were poems. His illustrations were constant and always changing. He kept his people wide awake and made them feel his earnestness.” Howard, who was a member of Beecher’s Plymouth Church, literally observed: “His acting power was marvelous. Those who knew him well will remember that when talked he could with difficulty sit still. He almost invariably rose, and in the excitement of description or argument acted the entire subject as it struck him.”3. First Lutheran Church ministering to people in downtown San Diego since 1888, seeks. Henry Ward Beecher was “the most accomplished artist of them all if stump oratory was required from the pulpit,” wrote Lincoln biographer Carl Sandburg. He was a prolific speaker and those speeches became the basis for published works. Halford Oh Come O Come Emmanuel SheetAmong Beechers’ books were Lectures to Young Men and the Plymouth Collection of Hymns, Norwood, a Novel of New England Life, and Star Papers. Rhetorical expert Halford R. Ryan called Beecher “the North’s vox populi on slavery.”5 That was particularly the case when Beecher lectured in England in 1. North’s cause. Like his novelist sister, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Beecher had a dramatic flair. This he did not only to help individual slaves to win their liberty but to dramatize before the public the evils of slavery very much as did his sister in Uncle Tom’s Cabin,” wrote Lyman Beecher Stowe. It was Mr. Beecher’s genius to create that public sentiment which underlies and gives force to political action in a democracy, and to give effective and eloquent expression to that sentiment when it had been created. To this work he gave himself with singleness of purpose, for he understood the mission to which he had been called better than any of his critics, better than some of his eulogists,” wrote Beecher biographer Lyman Abbott. Shortly before Mr. Lincoln visited Plymouth Church in February 1. Beecher conducted one of his most publicized church services . Not only did Beecher raise the required $9. Rose Ward Hart. Lincoln attended services at Beecher’s church. Henry Ward Beecher had a “flaming, demonstrative nature,” according biographer Paxton Hibben. Mr. Lincoln liked energetic preaching and had long admired Rev. Lincoln’s law partner, William H. Herndon, often gave him speeches by Beecher and other abolitionist preachers. Carpenter wrote that President Lincoln “once remarked to the Rev. He “always had one foot in heaven and the other in politics,” wrote Chase family chroniclers Thomas Graham Belden and Marva Robins Belden. Historian David Cheesebrough wrote: “The more popular a preacher, the more likely it is that he or she mirrors the hopes and fears of a significant number of people. Paxton Hibben has written that Henry Ward Beecher, the most popular preacher in the mid. Indeed, one can trace the development of Northern thought on slavery by observing the evolution of Beecher’s sermons on the same subject.”1. Abbott wrote that “it would be a mistake. Beecher or Plymouth Church was what is ordinarily called popular. If he was the most admired orator and the most beloved preacher of his time, he was also the most bitterly hated, excepting on Theodore Parker. No language was too bitter, no epithets too stinging to be applied to him.”1. Mr. Beecher was one of the few preachers who was both most effective in the pulpit and, if possible, more eloquent upon the platform,” recalled Republican politician Chauncey M. In one campaign his speeches were more widely printed than those of any of the senators, members of the House, or governors who spoke. I remember one illustration about his dog, Noble, barking for hours at the hole from which a squirrel had departed, and was enjoying the music sitting calmly in the crotch of a tree. The illustration caught the fancy of the country and turned the laugh upon the opposition.”1. Beecher himself caught the popular imagination. Biographer Howard wrote: “He wore his hair long, no beard was permitted to grow, and a wide Byron collar was turned over a black silk stock, and his clothes were of conventional cut. His hair was thick and heavy. His eyes were large and very blue. His nose was straight, full and prominent. His mouth formed a perfect bow, and when the well- developed lips pared they disclosed the regular, well- set teeth. There was nothing clerical in his face, figure, dress or bearing. He was more like a street evangel . Raymond, a Seward supporter: “You man, I know the people of this country at heart better than you do. Your friend Seward has too much heard and too little heart too succeed in any such crisis as this.” To which Raymond replied, “And yours I fear, has too much heart and too little head for such a crisis as will assuredly be precipitated.” Rejoined Rev. Beecher: “Trust then in God and keep your powder dry. After his election and after the outbreak of the war, Beecher, loyally supported by his church, consecrated his every resource to the winning of the war. He preached, he lectured, he wrote editorials. He had become the editor of The Independent. He told his wife to use for the cause his salary, by now an ample one, and all his income from his writings and lectures beyond their living necessities.”1. During Mr. Lincoln’s 1. President, wrote biographer Lyman Abbott, there is no evidence that “Mr. Beecher had any understanding or any correspondence with each other; but what Mr. Lincoln said in occasional private letters Mr. Beecher said with vigor from the pulpit, on the platform, and from the press. Beecher was not a diplomat; he had no skill in political arts; he did not know how to propose a scheme to blind the eyes of his opponents and to tide over a difficulty, . According to biographer Halford R. Ryan, “Beecher was something of a self. His evaluations of the president’s administration mellowed especially after the Emancipation Proclamation. Representative of this kind of oratory was a lecture entitled a Visit to Washington During the War. Since Lincoln did not bother to see Beecher when he visited Washington in 1. Beecher coyly allowed that he knelt on the grounds of the White House lawn and prayed for the president and the country.”1. Beecher’s admiration for President Lincoln continued to be intermittent during the Civil War. Historian Allan Nevins wrote that in 1. Beecher, rightly perceiving that slavery was the underlying cause of the war . Attorney George Templeton Strong wrote in late November 1. Last evening H. Beecher spoke again at our Academy of Music. Proceeds for benefit of Sanitary Commission. The tickets had been put too high, three dollars for reserved seats, and it was a vile rainy night . The speech was admirable and well received. Harriet Beecher Stowe, whom I found very bright and agreeable. Her brother is also a most interesting talker.”2. Beecher sometimes berated the President and sometimes backed him. Almost over night he became as radical as . But the three billion dollars’ worth of slave property which constituted the principal wealth of the South could and should, he felt, be wiped out with a gesture.”2. Biographer Paxton Hibben noted that Beecher’s irritation was not limited to President Lincoln. Lincoln in The Independent : “It would be difficult for a man to be born lower than he was. He is an unshapely man. He is a man that bears evidence of not having been educated in schools or in circles of refinement.”2. The weekly Independent had been purchased by a parishioner, Henry C. Beecher had become editor, but most of the publication’s editorial work was done by his assistant, Theodore Tilton. Freeman, “During the Civil War, there were rumors that Lincoln, when in a melancholy mood, would come to New York and at night surreptitiously slip over to Plymouth Church to receive the ministrations of Henry Ward Beecher. Of the origin of that myth, Sinclair Lewis wrote: . Wolf reported in his study of Mr. Lincoln’s religious practices: “According to a grandson of Henry Ward Beecher who claimed to have heard it from Mrs. Without giving his name he asked to see the famous preacher. Beecher at her husband’s bidding admitted the suspicious character. Behind closed doors she heard their voices and the pacing of their feet until the mysterious visitor left about midnight. Shortly before Beecher’s death he is supposed to have revealed that his caller was Lincoln in disguise. Since it seems to be reasonably well established that at the time alleged the President was in New York conferring with some of his generals I am disposed to believe it. It seems to accord with both Lincoln’s informality and his shrewd sense that he should have sought opportunity for an undisclosed talk with such a powerful molder of public opinion. And certainly Beecher’s attitude toward the President and his policies grew from then on constantly more understanding until they came into complete agreement.”3. Historian John W. Starr, Jr., reviewed the evidence and noted that the main arguments against the joint prayer stories were. First. According to the statement the story was never told by Mr. Beecher until more than twenty years had elapsed, this secrecy was incompatible with Mr. Beecher’s temperament. That not knowing whether the muffled visitor was .
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2017
Categories |